I've started 800 threads here, 3 mos. I knew

[andy]

I was prolific and knowlegable, but that wows even ME. :-)

[Stillwater]

I was prolific and knowlegable, but that wows even ME. :-)

Melvin, it must not take much to impress you. Your posts contained very little legitimate content. Your posts are just repititious copies of everything you have posted over the last three years, since you were released from prison.

You are not technical, all you do is copy, cut and paste, without significant, or interesting content.

Actually MELVIN, on a scale of one to ten. One (1) being Moron, and ten (10) being genius, you're about a -.75. Thats minus point seven-five, MELVIN.

Bill

[41mag]

:bow01:












putz.

[Magnum88C]

800 threads, and only 4 subjects.

[Aslan]

I'm happy for you GK, if that is how you measure your successes, then good for you.

How many of the topics / threads actually deal with different subjects?

How many of them stood up to any scrutiny or criticisms?

How many of them were simply derogatory, inflamatory language with zero value beyond insults?

How many of them were self-congradulatory, like this thread?

And what does the number of threads have to do with knowledge? Ten stupid posts are still ten stupid posts. You cannot make up for quality with quantity.

The number of posts made is not an indication of quality, nor is it an indicator of knowledge. Take this thread, for example, it will be included in a future count you post - yet what value is contained here? what knowledge is being demonstrated? (other than you can count?)


:devil:

[Stillwater]

yet what value is contained here? what knowledge is being demonstrated? (other than you can count?)

Aslan, isn't counting an accomplishment? There has to be something that MELVIN can do, or his life is wasted.

Bill

[Garand]

There were 4 topics? I must have missed 3 of them.