Flying for Columbine

[GBullet]

Michael Moore's bodyguard was caught illegaly carrying a gun in JFK airport.

Say, does anybody else remember an anti-gun movie called, "Bowling for Columbine"?

Oh, I'm sorry, gun laws just apply to people like us, not Michael Moore.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,144921,00.html

[andy]

Whatever made you think differently?

[Stillwater]

Michael Moore's bodyguard was caught illegaly carrying a gun in JFK airport.

Say, does anybody else remember an anti-gun movie called, "Bowling for Columbine"?

Oh, I'm sorry, gun laws just apply to people like us, not Michael Moore.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,144921,00.html

I hadn't heard that, Rolin. Thanks for posting it.

All the nasty anti-gunners, seem to rely on guns for some, "unknown reason".

[RIKA]

I'll lay odds that the bodyguard gets off with a warning. He should receive the same punishment as Bernard Goetz got for carrying an illegal gun.

RIKA

[Aslan]

Liberals rarely punish other liberals....

:devil:

[Stillwater]

To have had a California Gun Card, the body guard had to be well connected with somebody ...

The public at large cannot even smell a gun card, let alone get one ...

Califoria gun cards are only for politicans, liberals, celebrities, and their fellow travelers.

[Rich Z]

Heck, I would think having to be Michael Moore's bodyguard would be punishment enough! Could you imagine having to be in close proximity to that mutt day in and day out. :;puke02:

[andy]

how about just failing to do your job, at the first REAL opportunity? :-)

[Stillwater]

how about just failing to do your job, at the first REAL opportunity? :-)

That would be a FATE, worse than MELVIN ...

[John in AR]

Just next in the parade. Ted Kennedy and Rosie O'Donnell's bodyguards have been caught with weapons illegally as well, Carl Rowe was also; I'm sure there's others.

Gun laws don't apply to famous or powerful liberals.

[Rich Z]

If bodyguards are outlawed, only outlaws will have bodyguards....

[brass hammer]

if YOU are not, ABOUT 1/2 OUTLAW.
i think you/anbody that lays along those lines, WILL BE EASY PICKIN'S
for the more RUTHLESS/BRUTAL on the planet/in your hood.

there 'might' be a time in your LIFES [my friends] when being the meanest
of the mean MEANS ANOTHER SUNRISE![i could tell you about that,also!]

[Coyote]

Up until this point, I have both admired and despised Moore at the same time; I agree with about 30-40% of what he has said (depending on the movie), however (I draw some flack for this from my peers) I do not find him to be a credible source of information, because he stands to gain a great deal from each "documentary" (re: editorial). I respected him to a point, simply because I thought he was fairly honest and believed in what he was doing. Needless to say, he has shaken that respect.

That said, I dont particularly trust Fox News, either, especially with such a short article. In fact, I'm starting to completely distrust anything in the media these days. Ever seen "Wag the dog"?

[Terry G]

It reminds me of "Hanoi Jane" Fonda and her bootlicker husband Tom Hayden, stating that "If the could outlaw all guns in the U.S., they would." Three day's later a reporter with an axe to grind, (He was a Viet Nam Vet) found out that both Fonda and Hayden plus their bodyguards had CCW's and Fonda admitted they had extensive security and "some other forms of self-protection" in their home. Her explanation was they were not like ordinary people, and needed more protection. I guess that means that the rich have more rights than us lowly commoners.

[Rich Z]

Heck, why do you think they outlawed guns completely in Washington DC? The politicians wanted a "safe zone" around them. I'm surprised they didn't outlaw rails, tar, and feathers at the same time....

[Kent]

Up until this point, I have both admired and despised Moore at the same time; I agree with about 30-40% of what he has said (depending on the movie), however (I draw some flack for this from my peers) I do not find him to be a credible source of information, because he stands to gain a great deal from each "documentary" (re: editorial). I respected him to a point, simply because I thought he was fairly honest and believed in what he was doing. Needless to say, he has shaken that respect.

That said, I dont particularly trust Fox News, either, especially with such a short article. In fact, I'm starting to completely distrust anything in the media these days. Ever seen "Wag the dog"?

Alex Jones has a video about 9/11. Moores film was old news. You can download his movies and he does not care. AJ is not in it for the money.

If you are interested, go to nwowatcher.com board and ask where it can be downloaded at. (there are other sources, but MOST of them at that board are very helpful).
I guarantee you there are things in his movies that will blow your mind, and it is all documented from original "official" sources. Not the ramblings of some internet keyboard nutcase.