If US casulties go to 100 a DAY, we aint giving

[andy]

up that oil, or a strategic base in the Mid East.

[DaRkWoLf]

And we'd probably actually have a lot more free fire zones as well, and care less about innocent civies.

100 casualties a day isnt happening though, unless we take on Iran and Syria. But then we will probably employ ore high yeild weapons such as MOABs, Daisy Cutters, Bouncing Bettys, and other intricate, highly destructive things.

[Coyote]

Bigger bombs wont solve the problem, it will just piss people off.

100 per day wouldnt be possible in the first place, at least not for a sustained amount of time. To accomplish that the insurgents would need to start an actual revolution, open combat. And when it comes to open combat, Marines kick ass. Notice how only 20-something soldiers were killed in the entire Fallujah operation? Its because the rebels tried to fight them in the open.

[krept]

once GOOD CIA asset can often be more effective than a whole brigade of soldiers.

we definitely need better intelligence and we're just barely catching up to where we should have been years ago...

[andy]

that's just cause a whole brigade of soldiers doesn't amount to a crap, in nearly all cases.

[copycat]

What the hell are you trying to say Davis, just cause you couldn't hack it as a soldier gives you no right to belittle those who do serve. So shut the hell up you &%^$#)!## !@@.

[andy]

I"ve got an honorable discharge, spec 4 rank in 6 months, letter from my company commander in basic, leadership school grad, etc,etc, that proves you a )#(*, $#@&.

[copycat]

How come you didn't finish your term then????

[copycat]

that's just cause a whole brigade of soldiers doesn't amount to a crap, in nearly all cases.

So what the hell ARE you trying to say? Seriously.