[andy]

and the stupid pussy claims a Makarov is great, and a 10" 223 is useless beyond "pistol ranges". I got news for the dummy, the 10" 223 still expands a sp, still has 450+ ft lbs left at 200m. TWICE the power of a mak at 5 ft, and no, you AINT effective at 200m with a sidearm. You are BARELY effective at 20m, IF you have cover.

 

[Hard Ball]

The 10 inch .223 is an unreluable, inaccurate useless weapon.

 

[Magnum88C]

Has to compare his rifle to a pistol to try and make the rifle look good. . .LOL

 

[copycat]

And an M1A is more powerful at all ranges than your .223!! What the hell kind of logic is that..

 

[mrostov]

and the stupid pussy claims a Makarov is great, and a 10" 223 is useless beyond "pistol ranges". I got news for the dummy, the 10" 223 still expands a sp, still has 450+ ft lbs left at 200m. TWICE the power of a mak at 5 ft, and no, you AINT effective at 200m with a sidearm. You are BARELY effective at 20m, IF you have cover.

The 10" AR is inaccurate, unreliable, bulky for the power it produces, and is utterly outclasses by any other AR type rifle with a 16" or greater barrel.

HINT: The Mak is a pistol and WAY smaller than your bulky noisemaker.