First of all, you're dream SHTF of combat 24/7 won't happen, ever. It's already been explained why.andy said:223 IS as effective as 308, at what MATTERS
no, what's a fact, is you are clueless and wrong again:223 IS as effective as 308, at what MATTERS, and with a can, it's FAR better than 308. A 308 can that really IS effective at suppressing rapidfire, full charge ammo is SO big and heavy that it RUINS the rifle for anything but bipod type work. That is a FACT. The lw, compact 308 cans are pretty worthless with full charge ammo, in rapidfire. They are intended for SLOWFIRE, with 200 gr loads at 1000 fps. Hell yes, I can build a small, lw can for such loads. It's basically just a .45 ACP. 8" of 1.5" can will suppress such 308 loads to BB gun "noise", with ease, as long as you don't fire faster than 1 shot per second or so.
(Since this pic was made I swapped out the KAK 'blade' for a different brace. Like it much better now.)...A 308 can that really IS effective at suppressing rapidfire, full charge ammo is SO big and heavy that it RUINS the rifle for anything but bipod type work.
this is one of the funnier post I’ve come across! There are countless posts where all you do is brag about how many posts you makeIf all I wanted was post-count, dumbass, I could post 100x a day, no problem. Unlike you, I can TYPE, and I also KNOW thousands more times about guns than what you know, dumbass. 22 PRACTICE is 10x as likely to occur as 380 practice, dumbass. If you'd shot animals with both 22 and 380, dumbass, you'd KNOW that the 22 is JUST as "effective" as is factory 380 ammo.