andy said:
the 300 win mag gets the same wt bullets to about 500 fps more than the 308 does. 20% more recoil. Did the BAR have the same recoil-pad buttplate as the 308?
They both have (or 'had' for the BAR) factory recoil pads. Nothing aftermarket or fancy, just the normal, factory pads.
andy said:
how much does your "little" 308 weigh? Same 7 lbs as a Scout Rifle?
Had to look this up. The shooter's bible doesn't list the 20" 'Lightweight Carbine' anymore, just the normal "Sporter" at 8.0 pounds, and the newer "Ultralight" at 6.0 pounds. The Ultralight's weight includes a 24" barrel, 4" longer than mine has. So, figure a little weight loss with the shorter barrel, and add back in a little weight gain with the small "scout" scope, and 7 pounds should be pretty close; 7 1/2 max. Don't have a precise enough scale to say for sure.
Best comparison I can give is to a couple other guns I have. It's just 3/8" longer OAL than my little CZ 22 rifle, and 1 1/2" longer than my Mossberg 500 with an 18.5" barrel; so yes, it's a "little" .308 rifle. I do have a 'big' .308, a heavy Savage 10FP-LE "Police Tactical" with a 24" heavy barrel, with a fairly large scope and Harris bipod on it. Thing probably weighs 12 pounds or more.
The old BAR in .300 win mag is listed in my old 1992 shooter's bible at 8.4 pounds, so it was around 1 or 1 1/2 pounds heavier than my little 'scout' is. Don't know the "why" of it, but mine in .300 really kicked quite a bit. It's a slightly heavier gun (what, 15% or so), and an autoloader, so that should cut recoil some, but at the same time, it
is putting out 35-40% more power than the .308 does, which is very relevant.