450 or 45-70
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Magnum 12 ga slugs have almost
same velocity as the 405 gr 45-70, and you can often find a used pump gun for $200 or so. Do you really have enough use for it to bother? Got an AR-15? .458 SOCOM, .50 Beowulf, .50 AE uppers can be had for it, same ballistics as a 45-70, lighter gun, faster repeat hits, (bear defense) and the same "feel" as your fighting gun. Not sure about the prices, probably about $500 tho.
same velocity as the 405 gr 45-70, and you can often find a used pump gun for $200 or so. Do you really have enough use for it to bother? Got an AR-15? .458 SOCOM, .50 Beowulf, .50 AE uppers can be had for it, same ballistics as a 45-70, lighter gun, faster repeat hits, (bear defense) and the same "feel" as your fighting gun. Not sure about the prices, probably about $500 tho.
I wouldn't have the need for the extra .450 ooomph so I would opt for 45/70. Plenty of souped up loadings available as well as light cowboy action ammo. (Except that an AR carbine and 30/30 are all the power local deer seem to require. )
Andy - what about the romance of a lever action?
Those exotic uppers are in the neighborhood of a grand each I think.
Good to catch up.
Andy - what about the romance of a lever action?
Those exotic uppers are in the neighborhood of a grand each I think.
Good to catch up.
Joined
·
1,484 Posts
A friend of mine has had both.He kept the .45-70.Not because the recoil was bad on the 450 but because of the MUCH greater range of factory ammo for the old warhorse.If you handload then that problem goes away too an extent.
It'll be a fun gun either way.
It'll be a fun gun either way.
G
Guest
·might get a .45 Professional AR upper
same reason. Use the lathe to make 270 gr solid bronze slugs, at 2250 fps, 3000 ft lbs, so I can stop elephant charges with an AR-15.
same reason. Use the lathe to make 270 gr solid bronze slugs, at 2250 fps, 3000 ft lbs, so I can stop elephant charges with an AR-15.
Joined
·
7,230 Posts
New guy here; my first post, so take it for what it's worth. IMO, while "energy" figures aren't the only relevant factor, if you're comparing same-diameter weapons as we are here, energy numbers do shed light on some things.
If stuck with those two caliber choices, I couldn't say. The .45-70 is more common, and therefore more readily found in stores. The .450 is less plentiful, but more capable.
If I may suggest another route... a lever gun in .454 Casull. With full-power loads, it's got more power than the .45-70. (Don't know the .450's actual energy numbers; it's not listed even in the 2004 shooters' bible). But with top-end loads, the .454 breaks 2,000 ft/lbs in a revolver, with the revolver's cylinder-gap loss and one-third-the-length barrel (7 1/2" vs. 20 inches); so it should easily break 2600-2800 in a closed-breech rifle or carbine.
Other things the .454 has going for it are "same-caliber" rifle/pistol combo capability, and higher capacity in the rifle.
But the most impressive thing, imo, is versatility. Even sticking with factory ammo, you can get power levels of around 2,600-2,800 ft/lbs with top end loads, 1200-1600 ft/lbs with "medium" .454 loads, 600-900 ft/lbs with upper-end .45LC loads, and even down to 300-500 ft/lbs using normal or "cowboy" .45LC loads. So it's good for game from elk to rabbit, just by virtue of changing the round in the chamber; no conversion kits, no adaptors, etc.
Don't know if CCI still makes their shotshells in .45LC, but that would nearly make it a .410 shotgun as well.
If you reload (which you would almost certainly have to with the .450 anyway), you can tailor loads anywhere in the spectrum from 200 to nearly 3,000 ft/lbs. All in the same gun; that's versatility.
Plus, (in the Rossi, anyway) it's in the more "traditional" 1892 design, rather than the newer styles.
If stuck with those two caliber choices, I couldn't say. The .45-70 is more common, and therefore more readily found in stores. The .450 is less plentiful, but more capable.
If I may suggest another route... a lever gun in .454 Casull. With full-power loads, it's got more power than the .45-70. (Don't know the .450's actual energy numbers; it's not listed even in the 2004 shooters' bible). But with top-end loads, the .454 breaks 2,000 ft/lbs in a revolver, with the revolver's cylinder-gap loss and one-third-the-length barrel (7 1/2" vs. 20 inches); so it should easily break 2600-2800 in a closed-breech rifle or carbine.
Other things the .454 has going for it are "same-caliber" rifle/pistol combo capability, and higher capacity in the rifle.
But the most impressive thing, imo, is versatility. Even sticking with factory ammo, you can get power levels of around 2,600-2,800 ft/lbs with top end loads, 1200-1600 ft/lbs with "medium" .454 loads, 600-900 ft/lbs with upper-end .45LC loads, and even down to 300-500 ft/lbs using normal or "cowboy" .45LC loads. So it's good for game from elk to rabbit, just by virtue of changing the round in the chamber; no conversion kits, no adaptors, etc.
Don't know if CCI still makes their shotshells in .45LC, but that would nearly make it a .410 shotgun as well.
If you reload (which you would almost certainly have to with the .450 anyway), you can tailor loads anywhere in the spectrum from 200 to nearly 3,000 ft/lbs. All in the same gun; that's versatility.
Plus, (in the Rossi, anyway) it's in the more "traditional" 1892 design, rather than the newer styles.
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Join the discussion
