Ankeny, I understand everything that you say and I appreciate your time in addressing my comments.
I make the distinction between "fun fun" and "serious fun." Fun fun is something that I do that I get enjoyment from and don't necessarily expect a "payoff" for in the real world... things like watching a movie, playing Pictionary with friends, jamming in a drum circle, painting with acrylics, carving tikis out of wood. I truly do all of these things for the pure enjoyment of it.
Things that I do for "serious fun"... kicking and punching my heavybag. Hitting the same with rattan sticks, a rattan blade that I made. Grappling every once in a while with my brothers in law. Knifemaking. Shooting. Although there is a "serious" connotation, I really, really enjoy them and get a big smile on my face even though there is a practical application for them (offense/defense/weapons making).
I am interested in the IDPA because of it's "serious fun" application. I want to be as good as I can be and not simply the transitory "best" of all at the current game. That's why I admire those who use "real world" gear and garments, while I respect all who do it for serious fun and for fun fun.
With all of my other hobbies, I simply cannot get into more "fun fun" stuff, but I can justify serious fun stuff, especially because it's awesome and helping hone real world skills. Even if I had the money for a self defense shotgun, a trap and skeet shotgun, a bolt action rifle, a couple revolvers, etc. I wouldn't have the time to shoot them. For that reason, I choose to only own a few weapons and seek to master them.
Of course I agree with what you said... even someone that shoots in "gaming" most of the time will almost always have superior skills over someone who shoots rarely and not under pressure.
I think that andy mostly gives advice to the "little time, little money" crowd and that's why I appreciate it. For those who already have their gear, training and philosophy locked, I can easily see why they don't get much out of what he's saying and choose to focus on the character issues. I disagree with some of what he says... like the coat issue (I was outside in shorts and tee shirt last night at 10PM) and that folks are "cheating" when they use the tac vest reinforced with plastic or whatever (they most likely aren't being true to what they would normally wear, some exceptions, as noted). For the most part, however, I think he's spot on. It sounds like the SPIRIT of IDPA was to test your normal wear and gear, not anything else. Again, to those who have adapted their style and actually DO wear everything they game with, more power to em.
cheers