Huh?
Hi fellow members;
I am amazed that this is still going on. Geeesh, I 'really' find it hard to believe this is still going on. However, there still appears to be the same ole argument from Andy--- whether I'm telling the truth, or not. Actually, I have NO idea. I was interviewed by two local PD detectives the night it happened, and I was under very heavy sedation---- not truth serum. I believe most of it was morphine, and I still was in a lot of pain--- as I recall. Of course, I might be lying about the pain. Having been stabbed five times with a 36 inch sword, might not have hurt at all. I might have been lying about being stabbed.
I only thought I shot two, maybe three times--- as I recall. The police told me at a later date, that I had shot five times. Well, I didn't remember how many times I shot. I had to be told by the detectives, and the forensic guys that secured the crime scene, and processed it. Of course, the detectives and the forensic guys might be lying. Who knows what goes through their minds.
The guy's body was taken to the Fifth District Medical Examiner's Office, in Leesburg, Florida for an autopsy. Oddly enough, the M.E's story correlates with what I remember, and what the detectives and crime scene examiner's say about the incident. Of course, they all might have lied, staking their careers on a lie about an incident in a pawn shop. I'm certain they wouldn't think twice about it? yeah, right.
As far as myself remembering what happened, thankfully, I do not remember every little incident during that fight. What I do remember is bad enough for me, and that is enough. Again; the forensic evidence , and what the crime scene told the detectives and C.S. people, is that what I told them in the many interviews that were given to the police by myself, was closer to the truth of what happened than even I could recall by myself. I really do not know what else to say about the matter, except that the evidence backs me up, and Andy is just ignoring the facts of the incident, and as a result is showing real ignorance---- contempt before investigation. In this particular instance, the investigation was done by non partial professionals, in the performance of their duties, and the results were 'negative'. It was a 'good shoot', as they say in LEO circles. By his refusal to acknowlege this, he shows his contempt, as well as his ignorance. Oh well, no accounting for taste and class.
I thank you fellows for coming to my defense, without even the privilege of knowing you personally. People , like most of you on this group, make it a lot easier for me to stumble through life. People, like Andy, remind me of dry, crusty fecal matter hanging on the hairs of my ass that need to be washed away in the shower, and go down the drain.
Thanks again,
J David