1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Not sure who you are trying to call a dumbass since I haven't seen anyone mention a 69gr bullet, but the fact remains that the 11.5" CAR still sucks for range. That is a FACT.
There is no substitute for barrel length as long as you are still using burning chemical propellant to move the bullet. That's just a matter of mechanics and physics.
The optimum bullet for such a short barrel is probably the 77gr Sierra OTM that the SF teams have been giving favorable mention about when fired out of their 14.5" M4 barrels.
There is no substitute for barrel length as long as you are still using burning chemical propellant to move the bullet. That's just a matter of mechanics and physics.
The optimum bullet for such a short barrel is probably the 77gr Sierra OTM that the SF teams have been giving favorable mention about when fired out of their 14.5" M4 barrels.
Post the link where it gets this [email protected] fps from a 11 inch barrel. No post, no proof. We have posted where the chrono is for 20 and 16 inch barrel loads.
You want to know why you don't see 11 inch barrel chrono loads? Cause only losers use a CAR.
You want to know why you don't see 11 inch barrel chrono loads? Cause only losers use a CAR.
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Join the discussion
