Andy, I really don't care about ho many posts somesone makes - it is the quality of the posts - and not the quantity - that matter to almost EVERYONE except you. BUT, I don't like bad math. It shows a weakness in mental capacity that bothers me, so I will humor youi for a second.andy said:I don't leave stuff that confuses the meaning of the post, and if you EVER posted 10% as much as I do, you MIGHT have a point. But you never will, so you DON'T have a point.
This is pretty much accurate as of 1pm on 12Jun06"
10% of your posts would be 8803*.10= 880.3 posts, or no more than 881 posts. I've got over twice that, so I guess that means (1) I might have a point, (2) you were wrong saying I'd never post 10% as much as you, and (3) you have issues with basic mathematical concepts.
Combine the last 2 points: apparent inability to do simple math and a proven capacity to make a mistake. I don't think I'll trust ANY of YOUR recomendations (like powder recs for certain bullet types)...EVER. You don't seem to be able to figure out, as verifiable proof, what would be safe and what would not be safe.
Hmmmm, your inability to do simple math seems to indicate that maybe you aren't as quick as you claim (I mean, can you subtract single digit numbers from single digit numbers?) and neither are your projectiles (can you even figure averages or a proper velocity?). THIS would explain a lot to many of us. If you need help figuring out your fuel economy some time, let use know. We'll do it for you, or you might start claiming a Dodge Ram V10 gets 456 miles per gallon.