[andy]

I was prolific and knowlegable, but that wows even ME.

 

[Stillwater]

I was prolific and knowlegable, but that wows even ME.

Melvin, it must not take much to impress you. Your posts contained very little legitimate content. Your posts are just repititious copies of everything you have posted over the last three years, since you were released from prison.

You are not technical, all you do is copy, cut and paste, without significant, or interesting content.

Actually MELVIN, on a scale of one to ten. One (1) being Moron, and ten (10) being genius, you're about a -.75. Thats minus point seven-five, MELVIN.

Bill

 

[41mag]

:bow01:












putz.

 

[Magnum88C]

800 threads, and only 4 subjects.

 

[Aslan]

I'm happy for you GK, if that is how you measure your successes, then good for you.

How many of the topics / threads actually deal with different subjects?

How many of them stood up to any scrutiny or criticisms?

How many of them were simply derogatory, inflamatory language with zero value beyond insults?

How many of them were self-congradulatory, like this thread?

And what does the number of threads have to do with knowledge? Ten stupid posts are still ten stupid posts. You cannot make up for quality with quantity.

The number of posts made is not an indication of quality, nor is it an indicator of knowledge. Take this thread, for example, it will be included in a future count you post - yet what value is contained here? what knowledge is being demonstrated? (other than you can count?)


:devil:

 

[Stillwater]

yet what value is contained here? what knowledge is being demonstrated? (other than you can count?)

Aslan, isn't counting an accomplishment? There has to be something that MELVIN can do, or his life is wasted.

Bill

 

[Garand]

There were 4 topics? I must have missed 3 of them.

 

[Dorobuta]

I was prolific and knowlegable, but that wows even ME.

knowledgeable and threads starts are two very distinct things. You start a lot of threads - often by responding to another thread with a new one. Then you post the same basic post multiple times. You also seem incapable of putting threads in the correct forums with actual titles. Prolific? yes. Knowledgeable? Your posts and the site highlight how this doesn't appear to be the case. You appear to be a randomly posting nut case. You could, of course, change this image by posting in the correct forums, in the correct threads. Small children can do this. For some reason, you can't. This posting style only makes you look undisciplined and ignorant. But it's your choice.

 

[John in AR]

I've started 800 threads here...

...and refuse to participate in them beyond drive-by, pontificating opening sermons. Basically that makes you the televangelist of the internet gun forums. Congratulations on that.

 

[BigEd]

...and refuse to participate in them beyond drive-by, pontificating opening sermons. Basically that makes you the televangelist of the internet gun forums. Congratulations on that.

SAY YA-YAH!!!
🤣