handling, and trigger pull SUCK. Especially the trigger pull. It fires from the open bolt (if it's a full auto, anyway) and that means it SLAMS the bolt home to fire a shot, and if you "think" that that AINT a MAJOR problem to accuracy, u r quite ignorant. Full auto(or shotgun) is the mark of the lame who is SCARED he can't handle things with semi auto. A bolt action is STILL a HORRIBLE handicap, at ranges MUCH greater than the 35m to which you MIGHT be able to make a suppressed MAC suffice. The auto still offers faster hits on multiple targets, MUCH faster hits on same target at 200m. You CAN miss, you know, especially while being shot-at. only idiots pretend otherwise.
Posts by andy
1 - 5 of 17 Posts
<font color=red>[**censored**]</font> your NECK, punk. What's it to u, anyway?
I wanted Hard Rock's bs up where EVERYONE can see it, that's all. I notice you CAN'T refute what I say about the FACTS of the gun-matters.
All a pos like you CAN do is carp about ME, from the sidelines. Why don't you go back to PN, u pos, and tell everyone THERE how much you 'know" about guns, shooting, etc, hmm? Because NONE of you know jack <font color=red>[**censored**]</font>, compared to what I know. You all come here to LEARN from ME.
I wanted Hard Rock's bs up where EVERYONE can see it, that's all. I notice you CAN'T refute what I say about the FACTS of the gun-matters.
All a pos like you CAN do is carp about ME, from the sidelines. Why don't you go back to PN, u pos, and tell everyone THERE how much you 'know" about guns, shooting, etc, hmm? Because NONE of you know jack <font color=red>[**censored**]</font>, compared to what I know. You all come here to LEARN from ME.go ahead, stupe. I did NOT say a riot
gun has a 26" barrel, dumbass. U cant READ, that's all. I ALREADY showed everyone (who can READ, that is) that such a claim is bs. I never claimed that the 223 could do EVERYTHING that a 308 can. It can't waste as much money,for instance. I never SAID anyone NEEDS more range than the 11" CAR has, either. That is YOUR stupid ASSUMPTION, dummy. All I SAID was that if you WANT to waste your time and money on such things, the 223 CAN handle it.
I never said 1 in 13 was same as 1 in 2. I said ANYTHING not over 50%, 2 possible outcomes, is just LUCK. HOw "little' or how much LUCK is needed is irrelevant. SKILL has nothing to do with a less than 50% outcome, hit or miss, and in any case, such a POOR rate of return is NOTHING to base one's tactics or gear choices upon. If you can't do it 90+% of the time, in PRACTICE, you WON'T do it more than 50% of the time when someone's trying to KILL you, count on that, stupid. A 40% reduction in one's neuromuscular control, when under LETHAL attack, is NOTHING. More likely, it wil be MUCH worse.
gun has a 26" barrel, dumbass. U cant READ, that's all. I ALREADY showed everyone (who can READ, that is) that such a claim is bs. I never claimed that the 223 could do EVERYTHING that a 308 can. It can't waste as much money,for instance. I never SAID anyone NEEDS more range than the 11" CAR has, either. That is YOUR stupid ASSUMPTION, dummy. All I SAID was that if you WANT to waste your time and money on such things, the 223 CAN handle it.
I never said 1 in 13 was same as 1 in 2. I said ANYTHING not over 50%, 2 possible outcomes, is just LUCK. HOw "little' or how much LUCK is needed is irrelevant. SKILL has nothing to do with a less than 50% outcome, hit or miss, and in any case, such a POOR rate of return is NOTHING to base one's tactics or gear choices upon. If you can't do it 90+% of the time, in PRACTICE, you WON'T do it more than 50% of the time when someone's trying to KILL you, count on that, stupid. A 40% reduction in one's neuromuscular control, when under LETHAL attack, is NOTHING. More likely, it wil be MUCH worse.
1 - 5 of 17 Posts
