fired from a rifle. U THINK a lousy 60 ft lbs more makes ANY difference? You THINK a .22 rifle and Stingers reliably stops even a chuck, ****, or jackrabbit? U have NO experience at hunting with them if you "think" such.
yes, dummies, I AM aware that u cant ccw a .22 rifle, but I am talking about the EFFECT of the bullet, NOT what gun fired it. If you wouldn't be comfortable facing a given threat with a .22 rifle, you SURE should'nt be comfortable about doing so with the Makarov, either.; At least with the rifle, at pistol ranges, it's EASY to get head hits, swiftly and repeatedly, and with the rifle, penetration with the .22 is considerably greater than it is with the .;22 pistol The 22 pistol can have about 100 ft lbs, and that's only 120 ft lbs from the pathetic 220 ft lbs of the Makarov. The Makis TWO HUNDRED AND TWENTY ft lbs short of the 440 ft lbs of the 90 gr 9x19 Cor Bon load. So the Makarov is TWICE as close to being a .22 as it is to being a real 9x19 load, and the 9x19 load is nothing much. Animal testing will prove that, REAL quick.
yes, dummies, I AM aware that u cant ccw a .22 rifle, but I am talking about the EFFECT of the bullet, NOT what gun fired it. If you wouldn't be comfortable facing a given threat with a .22 rifle, you SURE should'nt be comfortable about doing so with the Makarov, either.; At least with the rifle, at pistol ranges, it's EASY to get head hits, swiftly and repeatedly, and with the rifle, penetration with the .22 is considerably greater than it is with the .;22 pistol The 22 pistol can have about 100 ft lbs, and that's only 120 ft lbs from the pathetic 220 ft lbs of the Makarov. The Makis TWO HUNDRED AND TWENTY ft lbs short of the 440 ft lbs of the 90 gr 9x19 Cor Bon load. So the Makarov is TWICE as close to being a .22 as it is to being a real 9x19 load, and the 9x19 load is nothing much. Animal testing will prove that, REAL quick.