[andy]

a given load to realistically evaluate its performance . 357 Sig has no such level of use, as of yet ,and won't have, for many years yet. it takes nearly 20 coin tosses to start showing the reality of the 50-50 chances of heads or tails. A couple of fast-repeat hits to the chest, with a .22, is right at 50% stopping reliabilty. So in order to establish that the 357 Sig is anything like even a 95% manstopper (ie, 5 failures in 100 shootings, you'd need at LEAST 200 shootings. cause just the 5 failures has a 50% chance of being luck (instead of say, 10 failures out of that 100)

 

[Unregistered]

And what do you use, stupekid? Dogs, cats, and gerbals? That's your level of science? Stupekid, the Texas highway patrol get into a pretty fair number of shootouts, many are not publisized and they ALL use the same load. That's a better indicator than stupekid's animal farm junk science.

 

[Stillwater]

Unregistered just pulled your pants down tard ...

And what do you use, <font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font>kid? Dogs, cats, and gerbals? That's your level of science? <font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font>kid, the Texas highway patrol get into a pretty fair number of shootouts, many are not publisized and they ALL use the same load. That's a better indicator than <font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font><font color=red>*</font>kid's animal farm junk science.

Animal farm junk science -- I love it -- keep it up.

Why don't you register and become one of us? The **** could use another good, registered, detractor.

Bill