so WHY settle for 1/4 or 1/2 as much power? The Kahr has 1/2again or twice again the power of a .38 snub, depending upon the load, and is more controlable and a lot "flatter" in your pocket, 40% more ammo in it, too. The Kahrs DO need their slide corners severely rounded, tho. Sharp square corners are a mistake on ANY carry pistol, and even more so on a pocket pistol.
no NEED of smaller, lighter than PM9 9mm
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Joined
·
5,697 Posts
no NEED of smaller, lighter than PM9 9mm, so WHY...
...do you recommend the 21A and HP22 so often? Same reason I liked the 21A (and still do), and same reason I like the P32. It's smaller and lighter.
...do you recommend the 21A and HP22 so often? Same reason I liked the 21A (and still do), and same reason I like the P32. It's smaller and lighter.
no, it's cause they are TWENTY TWOS, and readilly silenced. the .32 is not. sheesh. I dont recommend them because they are small, for the pocket. I recommend them because their ammo is cheap and universally available. not because they fit the pocket any BETTER than the Kahr, and certainly not because I think it's BETTER to have to aim at the brain, rather than hit the chest (with a 600 ft lb prefrag 356). The only thing about size with such guns is that a CANNED M21 can still be ccwed IWB, and swiftly drawn. They are also capable of being carried cocked and locked, a BIG help when you have to hit the brain. You are KIDDING yourself about the .32 's being worth a crap with a chest hit, and you are WILDLY optomistic about your ability to hit the BRAIN, with 200 rds of practice a year.
You'd probably like the K-9 or K-40 with the slightly (.5" I think) longer grip frame. My little finger doesn't get a good purchase on them, but you're would probably be fine. Stay away from the polymer ones as their frame rails will warp in rapid fire.Raider said:
But then again, you already have a real gun. . .
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Join the discussion
Join now to ask and comment!