You're right (sort of), I don't know of anyone that favors a navel rig for totin' a rifle. I don't think it's the love handles per se, just that in general rifles aren't well suited to carry like that...223 fan said:
:devil:
You're right (sort of), I don't know of anyone that favors a navel rig for totin' a rifle. I don't think it's the love handles per se, just that in general rifles aren't well suited to carry like that...223 fan said:have "Done-lap" disease, as in a BEER GUT. the only place they CAN ccw a belt rig is behind their hip, and even then, their love handles create problems, both comfort and speed of access type problems.
Aslan said:You're right (sort of), I don't know of anyone that favors a navel rig for totin' a rifle. I don't think it's the love handles per se, just that in general rifles aren't well suited to carry like that...
Well, can't really add much to that. . .
Aslan said:You're right (sort of), I don't know of anyone that favors a navel rig for totin' a rifle. I don't think it's the love handles per se, just that in general rifles aren't well suited to carry like that...
:devil:
You missed the point! You don't HAVE to run when you're wearing this rig - they come to YOU!Aslan said:I would think it would chafe and make running ...
Aslan said:I stand corrected, I now know of ONE person who favors carrying a rifle that way.
I would think it would chafe and make running and sitting, well, interesting.
:devil:
I'll settle for pulling the trigger whilst it's holstered. . .Garand said:I really want to see naval carry of a CAR.
NO! He said appendix carry not navel! :dgrin:Aslan said:I stand corrected, I now know of ONE person who favors carrying a rifle that way.