OK, I feel like playing around with the structure here, just to see how it will look and whether it is workable or not. It may not be permanent, but any messages that get placed in them will get moved to an appropriate place if I decide to mix things up in another direction.
But here's a question for you about what is the most logical arrangement:
Suppose I want to break down the HANDGUNS section into subcategories. What is the most logial to YOU about how to do that:
(1) By manufacturer, (ie: Colt, Smith & Wesson, Glock, etc.), then further break that down by type of handgun (ie: Revolver or Semi-Auto).
OR
(2) By type of handgun, (ie: Revolver or Semi-Auto) then subcategorize that by manufacturer (ie: Colt, Smith & Wesson, Glock, etc.).
I can see it going either way, but I don't want to assume my logic is everyone's logic.
What seems to YOU to be the most intuitive arrangement?
Or is there another way that I am overlooking?
Thanks.
But here's a question for you about what is the most logical arrangement:
Suppose I want to break down the HANDGUNS section into subcategories. What is the most logial to YOU about how to do that:
(1) By manufacturer, (ie: Colt, Smith & Wesson, Glock, etc.), then further break that down by type of handgun (ie: Revolver or Semi-Auto).
OR
(2) By type of handgun, (ie: Revolver or Semi-Auto) then subcategorize that by manufacturer (ie: Colt, Smith & Wesson, Glock, etc.).
I can see it going either way, but I don't want to assume my logic is everyone's logic.
What seems to YOU to be the most intuitive arrangement?
Or is there another way that I am overlooking?
Thanks.