Firearm Forums - Arms Locker banner
1 - 2 of 5 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,690 Posts
RIKA, an inexpensive ceramic that could be used in this way is alumina, it's Al2O3, I think.

This raises an interesting point. Allow me to illustrate it with a question.

Why would you want to make the baffles out of ceramic?...

When the gas exits, it has two types of energy that the suppressor must reduce, kinetic energy (energy of motion) and thermal energy (heat). The gas's kinetic energy can be reduced by constricting the gas flow (big volume with a tiny hole for the bullet to pass through) and turbulence to increase entropy (swirl the gas just like a centrifugal bullet trap catches a bullet)

Baffles are by function supposed to remove energy from the gas. Baffles should impede the flow of the gas, as well as remove heat.

Yes, ceramic casts well and the baffles could be designed to be constructed from ceramic. Consider though that the same sized aluminum baffles could reduce the sound more than could ceramic, because of the Al baffles' better ability to soak up heat from the gas.

Don't forget the structural issue, either. For the ceramic baffles to take the violent rush of propellant gas, it may have to be much thicker than the aluminum, and therefore much heavier.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,690 Posts
TODD, what you have described sounds like some of the newer military suppressors. They telescope, or set back, over the barrel. These are popular for the fact that they don't increase the overall length like conventional designs. The telescoping design is also sturdier.

The ones that I have seen feature a large initial expansion chamber. Forward of the chamber are typically four or five baffles. The construction is usually stamped and welded steel. Stampings are more economical, yet can be just as strong as machinings and offer lower weight.
 
1 - 2 of 5 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top