and you've spent $400 on ammo. if u dont shoot anything like that much per year, the HP22 is going to last you a long time. $135, retail, with a $45 spare, 5" long barrel, that aint hard to shorten, thread for a silencer, either.
Spend that $400 on a M21 Beretta, (same cost used as a Mak) and you have a SUPERB kit gun and pocket gun. All you'll have with the Mak is a lame assed mak, STILL costing 5x as much to shoot as the .22, still not pocketable, still not ENOUGHmore powerful than the .22 to MATTER any, and u still wont be very skilled with it, either.
$400 spent onsmithing the M21 means it's got a threaded muzzle, with the front sight mounted on the thread protector, ready to mount a silencer. 2" groups at 25m, too. Perfect little companion on the trail, and canned, the perfect complement to the pocket 9 if shtf.
The NEXT year, $400 spent on .22 ammo will mean 20,000 rds shot thru the M21,making you FARmore able to pull head hits with it than you can with the Mak,and the Mak is so feeble that it sure DOES need head hits, in order to have a realistic chance of stopping anybody. 220 ft lbs just AINT much of a lick. HALF of what a good 9x19 load has, and NOBODY thinks a 9x19 is much of a manstopper.
Spend that $400 on a M21 Beretta, (same cost used as a Mak) and you have a SUPERB kit gun and pocket gun. All you'll have with the Mak is a lame assed mak, STILL costing 5x as much to shoot as the .22, still not pocketable, still not ENOUGHmore powerful than the .22 to MATTER any, and u still wont be very skilled with it, either.
The NEXT year, $400 spent on .22 ammo will mean 20,000 rds shot thru the M21,making you FARmore able to pull head hits with it than you can with the Mak,and the Mak is so feeble that it sure DOES need head hits, in order to have a realistic chance of stopping anybody. 220 ft lbs just AINT much of a lick. HALF of what a good 9x19 load has, and NOBODY thinks a 9x19 is much of a manstopper.