I'm bigger than the average guy, and my torso's "non-crease" zone is 12" wide by 24". Beyond 250m with iron sights, you are going to get a LOT less hits on realistic sized torsos than you are on "crazy Ivan"targets.
Also, this "cruzible" is bs, becaus after the first shot, the only STATIONARY target you will get (at best) will be the 10" circle of a head on prone man. More likely, you will get only the 1-2 second exposure of a cover user's head. That means you aint hitting SQUAT, with iron sights, beyond 200m, except by luck. Hit or miss is the same "2 possible outcome" situation as a coin toss. So if you can't hit with more than 50% of your shots, any hits you get are LUCK. Ducking bullets, and without ear protection, you are going to miss such targets a LOT at 100m, dude, along with the dodging torsos of men moving from cover to cover. That's just the reality of combat rifle shooting.
Beyond 200m, you need a scope, period. beyond 100m, given head shots at cover users, while under fire, a bipod is a BIG help, if the terrain will let you use prone at ALL, that is.
Also, this "cruzible" is bs, becaus after the first shot, the only STATIONARY target you will get (at best) will be the 10" circle of a head on prone man. More likely, you will get only the 1-2 second exposure of a cover user's head. That means you aint hitting SQUAT, with iron sights, beyond 200m, except by luck. Hit or miss is the same "2 possible outcome" situation as a coin toss. So if you can't hit with more than 50% of your shots, any hits you get are LUCK. Ducking bullets, and without ear protection, you are going to miss such targets a LOT at 100m, dude, along with the dodging torsos of men moving from cover to cover. That's just the reality of combat rifle shooting.
Beyond 200m, you need a scope, period. beyond 100m, given head shots at cover users, while under fire, a bipod is a BIG help, if the terrain will let you use prone at ALL, that is.