Hey NUTTY JOHN, are yoiu willing to prove that in Pagosa Springs? Or is this just more of you lip flapping insanity?andy said:I had to laugh when Teuf ADMITTED that guys have REAL trouble beyond 300m, on 17" wide, 52" marks, with 308 autos, iron sights and ball. 10" 223, scope and match ammo has ZERO problems on such marks, at 350m. If you are going to be STUPID, and be in open country in the daylight, you'd BETTER have a forend mounted bipod, scope, trigger job, match ammo, etc.
I think it's funny as hell, and I'm neck deep in it.krept said:Hmmm... now why would YOU of all people be asking that particular question? It doesn't have anything to do with... well, nevermind
Yes, darn it, I AM complaining... that there are too few people to appreciate the grand irony of what is happening here.
I also reserve the future right to complain if the above statements need further elaboration!
I guess my philosophy has been to try to give people what they really want. Sometimes you can't listen to what they are asking of you, but instead you have to go by what their actions are telling you.krept said:The most hilarious part is that if this happened when Rich were actively moderating, I could see how he might have thrown up his hands and axed the site... but, just like some Taoist philosophy... he let it all go and gained a comedy of divine proportions.