[andy]

u don't try it at STUPIDLY long ranges. Same thing with firing 2 guns at once. You better NOT bet much that I"ll miss your chest, just because I'm running, diving, etc, when the range is 6 ft or less. 6 ft covers well over 95% of civvie defense, since 90% doesn't require hitting anyone with a bullet, and well over half of the time, the attacker has no gun, ergo, no need to fire beyond 6 ft.

 

[Hard Ball]

More nonsense from a wannabe who has never been in a gunfight. If you ever are and you try to use your stupid fantasy tactics you will be dead.

 

[andy]

come TRY me.

 

[Garand]

Hard Ball would probably die laughing at you preform! Geez, I got a 1,000 postins, WOW!

 

[Magnum88C]

Yeah, big talker, all mouth. Won't even go camping because he might hurt himself. . .

Go back to humping your hog before you really get yourself hurt one of these days.

 

[Hard Ball]

"come TRY me."

It would be a wate of time and money. Bets and challanges, we all know that you never show up.

All "come TRY me." means is that you are wrong iand have no real answer.

 

[Glenn Bartley]

Andy,

Once again you made a fairly good point but ruin it all and invite harsh criticism because of your braggart attitude added onto that point.

yes, u CAN hit while running, the diff is that u don't try it at STUPIDLY long ranges. Same thing with firing 2 guns at once.

Why not leave it at the factual stuff that I just quoted instead of being a braggart?

You are right that shooting camn be done while on the run or with two guns at once. The thing is though that you are better firing one gun in the great majority of situations because you can aim better. As for foring while walking or running - it is something we train at in my agencyy on a regular basis. Much harder to shoot while moving laterally than it is to shoot at a target that is moving laterally, it takes some skill that must be practiced regularly.
All the best,
Glenn B